A practical guide for Alberta and B.C. yards: stop the easy thefts, record at the edge without opening inbound ports, build an evidence package an insurer can use, and stay on the right side of PIPA.
A contractor yard is an easy place to lose money. Tools walk out in a backpack. Copper leaves in a pickup after dark. A skid steer rolls onto a trailer that was never booked. Most yards already have cameras. What they usually do not have is a plan: what the system is supposed to prove, how long the footage lasts, who can reach the recorders, and whether an insurer would even accept the export.
This is a practical walk-through. It is written for owners and superintendents in Alberta and B.C. who run equipment, not a security department. It is not legal advice and it is not a product pitch. If a step needs a lawyer or a licensed alarm partner, it says so.
Start on foot, at the time theft actually happens. That is usually last light, Sunday morning, or the first quiet hour after the last truck leaves. Bring a notebook. Do not start with a sales sketch.
Write down four things:
Physical controls still do more work than another 4K dome. Lock the fuel. Put copper and small tools in a crib or a locked conex, not on an open pallet. Park machines away from the fence so a trailer cannot back up to the bucket. Hitch pins and battery disconnects are boring and they work. One controlled gate after hours beats three decorative ones.
Inventory matters more than people admit. Photograph high-value machines with serial plates. Keep a simple list: unit number, serial, last known hour meter, who has keys. If a machine leaves, you want a record that existed before the claim, not a memory.
Most yard losses are not cinematic. They are a habit gap.
None of that needs a cloud login. Do it first. Then decide what the cameras have to prove.
A useful camera plan answers specific questions after a loss:
That usually means a small set of jobs, not a camera on every pole:
Write the zones down. Note blind spots and power or network limits in the same note. A coverage plan you can hand to an installer (or to us) is worth more than a brochure with a camera count.
Do not point cameras into washrooms, change rooms, or a lunch table unless counsel has a specific, written reason. Do not treat the yard system as a performance-management tool. In Alberta and B.C. that is where privacy complaints start.
Every camera is a computer on a network. Consumer kits are famous for default passwords, UPnP, and inbound ports that show up on Shodan before the first weekend. A yard that opened a hole to "check cameras from the phone" has traded a theft problem for a remote-access problem.
The pattern that holds up on contractor sites is simple: record on the property, reach it without opening the firewall.
We review camera fleets the same way we review servers: exposure, credentials, segmentation, and whether anyone can wipe the evidence. A site-security assessment is not a requirement to buy hardware from us.
Adjusters and brokers do not want a Dropbox of 40 unnamed MP4s. They want a short package that answers the claim questions and shows you did not invent the clip after the fact.
Build the habit before the theft:
Stills help. A plate, a hitch, a face at the gate, the machine leaving. Pair them with the clip, do not replace it.
None of this guarantees a payout. It makes the conversation shorter. Carriers ask whether you had a system, whether it ran, and whether the export is trustworthy. A hashed file and a one-page note beat a login you cannot find on Monday morning.
Contractor yards record staff, contractors, delivery drivers, and sometimes the street. That is personal information. In the private sector, Alberta and British Columbia both use a Personal Information Protection Act (PIPA). Public bodies sit under different statutes. This section is a field guide, not an opinion letter. If you have a union, a live complaint, or cameras indoors on people all day, talk to counsel.
Write a purpose that is actually true. Safety, site security, and loss prevention are the purposes that hold up. Using the same cameras to grade who takes the longest smoke break is how employers get into trouble. An Alberta OIPC investigation into workplace cameras (Hoffman Holdings, 2005) treated security and safety as reasonable in that case and treated general performance monitoring as not reasonable. Do not put "productivity" on the sign if you cannot defend it.
Give notice before people walk into the frame. Signs at the gate and at shop entries. Plain language: cameras are in use for security and loss prevention, who to call with questions. Put the same point in orientation papers for employees. OIPC Alberta's private-sector video guidance expects noticeable signage and a contact. B.C.'s commissioner has the same expectation under B.C. PIPA: people should know they are being recorded before they have to choose whether to enter.
Minimize. Cover the gate, the apron, the laydown, the fuel, and the crib. Do not cover toilets, change rooms, or a lunch table. Avoid grabbing more of the public sidewalk or the neighbour's lot than the job requires. If a camera can do the job from a higher, wider angle that does not stare at faces all day, prefer that.
Have a short written policy. Purpose, where cameras sit, how long you keep footage, who can watch live or export, how someone asks for their own images, and what you do if footage is requested by police or an insurer. Name a person who owns the policy. Alberta PIPA expects an organization to have policies and someone accountable. B.C. is in the same family of rules.
Protect the recordings. Access control on the recorder, no shared "admin/admin," no inbound ports, and a rule that exports leave with a hash and a log. A camera system that is open to the internet is both a cyber finding and a privacy finding. If identifiable footage leaks and there is a real risk of significant harm, Alberta PIPA has breach-notification duties. Do not wait to invent a process after the leak.
Access requests are real. Staff and other individuals can ask for their personal information, which can include images of them. Know how you would find a clip and what you would withhold (other people's faces, security methods). You do not need a law firm on retainer to write a one-page intake for those requests. You do need to know who answers the phone.
Covert cameras are a high bar. Hidden indoor recording of staff is a different legal problem than an obvious dome on a pole at the gate. Do not "just add one in the shop" without advice.
Facial recognition and biometrics are not a default. That is a separate review. A yard does not need it to prove a trailer left at 1:14 a.m.
Week 1. Night walk. Photo inventory of machines and high-value tools. List keys. Write what last year's thefts actually cost. Note what the current cameras can and cannot show.
Week 2. Physical fixes: gate habit, fuel, crib, machine parking, lighting on the approaches. Assign the quitting-time walk to a named person.
Week 3. Camera hygiene: defaults, inbound ports, separate network, firmware, lock the recorder. Add or move views only where the walk showed a hole. Write the camera map.
Week 4. Retention number, NTP, one practice export with a hash and a cover note. Signs at the gate. One-page policy and a named contact. Tell staff what the system is for and what it is not for.
If you want a second set of eyes after that, a scoped site walk is the next step. You get a written coverage plan and a review of the system you already have. Buying hardware is optional and separate.
Yards lose equipment because the easy path is open and because the footage, when it exists, cannot be used. Close the physical path first. Record at the edge without opening the network. Keep a package an adjuster can read. Treat staff and visitors as people with privacy rights, not as scenery.
Forensic Five is in St. Albert, Alberta. We review contractor and industrial yards the same way we review websites: scope in writing, findings you can hand to a broker or a board, no requirement to buy the kit from us. If you want that walk, say so on the contact form under site security.
Security Analyst
Mathew leads assessments and consulting at Forensic Five from St. Albert, Alberta. His background is Linux systems, networks, and application infrastructure.
Tell us your name to start chatting.